INTRODUCTION. LI quam si quis bene perpexerit, uidebit multo meliores raciones pro eisdem quam contra eadem, prime enim ducere procedunt alie vero cum" .... (here two or three words are erased). The fifth and last treatise occupies no less than forty-seven leaves i. e. from leaf 87 to leaf 134 and is divided into fifteen chapters.... It is entitled : *e Tractatus de veris vniversalibus Magistri venerabilis Johannis Wycleph.' The two first pages contain a summary of the contents, beginning thus: — "Libellus de vniversalibus continet 15 capitula primum premittit primo trimembrem distinccionem de vniversalibus &c". The treatise itself commences (leaf 88. a) "Capitulum primum. In purgando errores de vniversalibus & circa (not cet. as Stephens has it) vniversalia sunt 3a introductoria premovenda & primo quod &... and concludes (leaf 34 b): Sed nimis longum esset ista pertinenter pertractare/ alijs itaque difficultatibus huius materie/ & aliarum hic tactarum expectan- tibus alibi suum locum/ Pono finem huic superficiali tractatui de vniver- salibus/ ad alios tractatus derebus prime intencionis/ ad quarum noticiam sentencia ista apperit agressurus. Explicit 1 tractatus de veris vniver- salibus Magistri venerabilis Johannis Wycleph Sacre theologie veri et magni professoris Anno domini M° CCC° L xxxx viijj in die Sancti Yeronimi 2 Slawy3 per manus Hus de Hussynetz 4 amen tak boh day : (the four last czech words in red. (See Appendix). I ought here to observe that it is in Wyclif's very treatise "de universalibus" that Höfler5 and Loserth 6 discovered a passage which was formerly considered to have a particularly important bearing upon our knowledge of the personality of Huss. The words referred to are: ..“Ego autem statui michi ipsi pro regula, quod quociescunque videro racionem 1 Dudik here (Vide Forsch. in S., leaf 202) wrongly gives 'explicat'. The word is certainly so written in the text that one one might be tempted to follow Dudik's reading, or rather read 'expliat'. But this may be a misprint, as on leaf 198 he has it correctly. The word has in our MS. something like this appearance 'expliat', but 2 Not Jeronymi, as Dudik has on Ieaf 202, though he writes it a = ci, not a. 4 Not Hussynec as Dudik, 3 Not Slavi as Dudik. correctly on leaf 198. 5 Höfler: Anna v. Luxemburg in den Denkschriften der Wiener Akademie reads. 6 The MS. followed by Loserth is in the University Library of Prague : 20, 150. Cod. Un. Prag. VIII, leaf 6, 8a. Do